Comments on: Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen hoax the 9/11 Truth Movement to Sell DVDs

By: Aide Landron

Aide Landron — Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:02:35 +0000

I don’t believe myself to be an addict. I really don’t. I think that I just ignore or smash or finally dismiss a model that I think is rooted in vintage balderdash, you know? For lack of a better word.

By: Cara Bridgers

Cara Bridgers — Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:37:00 +0000

Charlie Sheen is Awesome! I mean come on! 1 million twitter followers in 24 hours!

By: Ken

Ken — Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:49:02 +0000

does the Illuminati exist?

I don’t think so, not anymore.

the Bildrburgs?

yeah they exist.

the Trilateral commission

yep (Wikipedia has all this stuff so far).

The political connection to the Masons?

We’re about to do a show about the Masons, I’ll let you know.
Seriously though, sure, some Masons are in power, but why shouldn’t they be?

By: Daddy Tank

Daddy Tank — Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:43:52 +0000

You will be lucky to get any objective answers on any of these issues, but in answer to your questions :
1: Don’t know
2: The Bilderburg group does exist but is either a) the illuminati b)a bunch of silly rich guys (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7363141496991001225#)
3:Don’t know
4:Don’t know

By: Angela

Angela — Sun, 10 Oct 2010 07:56:22 +0000

I’m back again, I could only post so much. I see the questions have been posted late 2009. I sincerely hope this is still in operation. Please answer the above questions. I’ll do my own research; I just want clarification on the issues question I posted above, Thank you, Angela.

By: Angela

Angela — Sun, 10 Oct 2010 07:52:07 +0000

Ok, I’m confused. I’m not easily convinced by any media source. I have watched A.J. a few times, and I was never sure what to believe where he is concerned. I see, according to the posted responses, that there is somewhat of an oppositional fervor concerning Mr. Jones’s reporting tactics. That being said, all I want to really know is this: does the Illuminati exist, the Bildrburgs, the Trilateral commission, the political connection to the Masons?

By: Jes

Jes — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:44:42 +0000

Alex is a crook. $$$$

By: Daddy Tank

Daddy Tank — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:40:05 +0000

Thanks Nickronomicon, you saved me some time and effort there.

John, just so you know, people wont be fooled by the “oh attack my spelling if you will but my principles are unassailable” schtick, because the internets been round a while and we’ve seen you before.

By: AD

AD — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:32:51 +0000

I’ve been reading a few of the blogs and forum posts such as the AboveTopSecret site, the James Randi site and so on but not on Jones’ site.

I have not listened to his show; but I’m wondering if anyone has rung him up on his show to take him to task?

Has there been anyone calling in with the issues that the blog-o-sphere have been raising?

I find it odd that he complains of psyo-ops, government cover-ups and then “admitting to x/y”, but when he is asked he gets all angry.

The questions raised by this and other blogs are, it seems:

1. Was this a psyo-op by Jones himself?
2. Was this a publicity stunt by Jones to drive traffic to the site, and is he apologetic about this?
3. If this was a stunt, or a hoax; is Jones believe it was worth it, despite the negative publicity? And further, does Jones believe the ends justifies the means?
4. How many prison planet premium members have left post this fiasco?
5. Jones is blaming the software, but why was the final message about it being a ‘made up story’ not posted above the article that Sheen wrote?
6. Some have questioned Jones’ motives and modius operandi in this fiasco; I’d like to know what Jones’ thoughts are about the various issues that they’ve raised and how does he counter their arguments?

I don’t think I complied all the questions; but I’m really interested in AboveTopSecret or others have put together a question list and put Jones to task?

Thanks.

By: Nickrnomicon

Nickrnomicon — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:08:33 +0000

argh!!! Ken (that’s Eakins, he’s the webmaster here), I apologise but I have to step in here.

He was sending quotes back at you because you’re so self-absorbed that you missed the point he was trying to make!

If you READ THE ARTICLE you will see that Alex Jones had NO DISCLAIMER on the ORIGINAL post he made, and that Above Top Secret had kept a cache version of it to make a point.

I find it annoying when wannabe-intellectuals come to this site, and then show off their skills (you’re right, your semantics are appalling). He didn’t pull anything out of thin-air, he was pointing out the parts your massive brain must have missed.

As for Mother-Hen guarding her eggs, and this being a quaint site. You’re an appalling judge apparantly; as for the boobs and so forth, he was being amusing.

Now please go away you annoying troll, and take some time back in your local educational establishment; not to learn to write (though that may help), but to learn to READ BEFORE OPENING YOUR MOUTH!

*pant* *pant*

Sorry Ken, I love this site (as do MANY others) and I hate it when some prick comes along and engages in pseudo-sensible debate, only to make him/herself look good (but in the process shows what an idiot they are).

rant over